Many sports trends are recognizable and often recurring, because in the world of sports changes evolve slowly. Sometimes, my analyses may come across as heavy handed, but I am always optimistic when it comes to sport and the increasing digitization of our world.
Global sports politics are at a dead end
phrase “If not now, when?”, a creed that drove the sports world in 2015. Could it get any crazier, more
ego-driven, or of the reservation? Many organizations competed for the top
prize, with the UEFA and IAAF doing its best to knock FIFA off its perch as the
“Biggest Sports Boneheads.” Can we call this sport? I really doubt it. I
stumbled upon a good read on the sports capitalism in FIFA and was struck by
the word Sportpolitik (Swiss-German).
The difference between the politics we know from every day life and the Global
Sports Politics is that rules and control measures don’t apply in the latter.
It is time to implement these rules in order to correct what is wrong in global
sports. In 2015 small steps were taken to regain control. Instead of looking
for an instant fix, we should use the next Olympic/World Championship cycles to
right the ship. The only man that I believe has any chance to spearhead these
sweeping changes is Thomas Bach (photo). It is not without reason that he has
turned to an avenue outside of sports, namely the United Nations, to draw
attention to the foul play.
"If not now, when?"
Sponsors and government subsidies are essential
Sports don’t operate in a
vacuum. Essentially everything mentioned above can also be attributed to
“normal” politics and the “normal” corporate world. All of a sudden big names,
big stadiums and big events aren’t at the center of sports. There seems to be a
trend against this against the grain with regard to money having the final say
in sports. Organized sports haven’t quite adjusted to this phenomenon yet.
Those at the forefront of sports politically as well as on a corporate level
are returning to the essence of sports: namely the sport itself.
in the Netherlands ING won the SponsorRing for sports with their campaign
focused on clubs and Rabobank is trending in the same direction. They too have
shifted their focus to local sports initiatives. The third large Dutch bank,
ABN AMRO, is slowly taking steps away from the highest level of sports by
putting an emphasis on talent. The banks
don’t really have a choice as the demands of the financial regulations office and other overseers directly
reduce their options for traditional sponsoring and visibility. Other large sponsors are soon to
follow in this regard. The world is changing so quickly that the biggest
sponsors in the Netherlands can’t gauge how quickly they have to amend their
positioning. This goes for alcohol- (Heineken, Jupiler) and soft-drink (Coca-Cola,
Red Bull) producers, energy providers (Vattenfall, Eneco and cable companies (KPN
between TV and content
you read through this article you’ll see the word “content” come by every once in
a while. Red Bull has been a synonym for “content” over the past few years and
basically invented the game of “sponsoring = content.” But, Ziggo and KPN will
introduce a totally new game within the year to win over the favor of the
customer. Vodafone has also entered the race. Tele2 is doing its best to catch up to its competitors as
well. All of a sudden their main concern is music, TV series and in particular
sports. No longer are the companies competing for internet plans and gigabytes
or texts or call minutes. England seems to be a little ahead of the curve and
in Canada a regional operator took the leap and bought an ice hockey franchise.
In the Netherlands we are still adjusting to sports talk shows on KPN and
Ziggo. So I began to wonder if we would ever get used to these programs and how
long will their run last.
"sponsoring = content"
What does the sports fan get out of all of this? In the coming year we
will see on Eurosport, Ziggo, FOX and KPN and the traditional outlets such as
NOS, RTL and SBS how it wil play out. This doesn’t even take into account the
so-called ‘Multi-Channel Networks’ or ‘Over the Top’ (OTT) offers available
from the top leagues online through legal and illegal streams. We are still
waiting on the Spotify or Netflix of sports. I, and I’m sure many others, are
waiting for the services of an independent provider that can provide an outlet
for us to enjoy sports in such a way. With the increase in money earned from
media rights many of the leagues around will get an injection of funds. This
will certainly cause changes around the world of sports as mentioned above.
Equality in sports
Taking the reins yourself still has one advantage: that of
unfiltered communication. Every athlete, sport, club or event can have direct
contact with his or her fans. That means that the old privileges evaporate. In
particular the focus on the white male athlete seems to be deteriorating. Because
his very livelihood is dependent on this phenomenon Maurits Hendriks has
shifted the focus to women and their success in sports. The biggest star in Rio
de Janeiro is a woman, Daphne Schippers. In women’s hockey the pressure has
risen to gold medal or bust. Volleyball, handball and water polo haven’t
qualified for Rio but 2015 was a monumental year in women’s sports.
The fact that Serena Williams was voted athlete of the year in Sport International says a lot about the current state of equality in sports. Next to the moral obligations there are also economic incentives for equality for women’s sports. By 2020 Nike wants to have 50 million dollars in profit but none of that will be possible without the participation and level footing of women and men in sports. If Nike takes the lead in this the other large sports brands are sure to follow suit forcing the sports organizations to do the same.
"Next to the moral obligations there are also economic incentives for equality for women’s sports"
No more social
Unfiltered communication is a two-sided coin. With
the reduction in the dependence of traditional media there seems to be an
increase in dependence on new media. Facebook in particular, think also
Instagram, Youtube and Twitter are building strong bonds with sports
organizations and athletes. As I mentioned in the top 5 developments for socialmedia in 2016 : I see a change brewing. ‘Social media’ is often a misleading
term. Look for example at Facebook that has long been more than just a social
network. They also offer media functions, distribution, creation, advertising
and hundreds of other services. This means that we’re going to have to call the
media by a different name. There is nothing social about buying advertising on
Facebook, Twitter, Instagram or Twitter. Advertising is advertising.
Distribution is distribution and content is content. Sports organizations would
be well served to be frugal with their fan communities and content. Likes and
followers aren’t equivalent to good content or a real connection with fans
especially not if you buy them. Sponsors will figure this out soon enough.
"Advertising is advertising. Distribution is distribution and content is content."
Sport is so much more than just sport. Sports embed themselves in your
heart and soul of society through all the other cultural icons we can enjoy
such as art, food, fashion, architecture, nature, even business, politics, and
science. The sportification of the world is inevitable. Conversely, it appears
that sport is changing. Sport is becoming more individualized and more
artistic. An important reason for this is that team sports it is much more
difficult to make snackable content than for individual sports.
"Sport is becoming more individualized and more artistic"
See the rise of Red Bull
and GoPro as an example: we enjoy artists that perform on boards and on bikes.
The second reason is that we live in a time where the artistry is valued just
as highly as the discipline itself. This means that that team play will also
start to fade into the background. In it we see more conceptualizing and
innovation in sports. Sometimes we even see explicit artistry in sports (think
about sport shoe fashion and snow-, surf-, skateboard designs), or more subtly
is the action sports where juries mark athletes on style as well as
technicality. The drive to content and creativity for the more creative person
leads to the sport itself becoming more creative and that sponsors will be
drawn to the art in sport.
This is the outlook of sports in 2016. This isn’t a complete overview
of the year, but it offers a solid framework for the trends of 2016 and enough
food for thought.